Sacred Chickens
  • Sacred Chickens Blog
  • Books, Podcasts, and Other Fun Stuff
  • Contact
  • Sacred Chickens Blog
  • Books, Podcasts, and Other Fun Stuff
  • Contact

Thoughts on Narrative, Empathy and Change

11/4/2018

0 Comments

 
Picture

​Thoughts on Narrative 

by Julie Carpenter 

I’m going to discuss a topic that at first glance might seem to be a poor fit for a blog where we discuss stories.  But bear with me, I think it has more resonance with our narrative obsession than might be readily apparent.
I recently read an article on 538 exploring the question of whether people choose candidates based on their current beliefs or whether they change their beliefs to conform with a candidate of their party.  Hovering in the air, in the media, in private conversations there is increasing concern over the every more tribal nature of politics, so this seems like a valid question. Furthermore, we have a strange suspicion of people who change positions and values.  In part this is warranted.  We can’t trust people who tell us something one day and another thing the next.
 
In short Matt Grossman, the author of the article in question, asks if we choose teams first and then follow our leaders into more and more extreme territory, or do we select leaders based on our long-held values?  The answer, given the studies that are referenced is somewhat nuanced, but concludes that after people choose their candidates, they change their own beliefs to line up with the positions of their candidates, moving further left or right.  (Please go read the article.  It’s hard to list all the conclusions adequately in this space.)
 
His caveat is that there are foundational positions which may lead voters to join either the GOP or the Democratic party in the first place. For instance, Grossman links to studies showing that when it comes to general racial issues, people who feel more comfortable with white people became republican. 
 
But on more specific racial and gender issues, voters became more like their party’s candidate.  Democrats, more than republicans, changed their viewpoints on issues, moving more in line with their candidate’s positions, becoming more sympathetic to Black Lives Matter and more concerned about gender equality issues, while Trump’s sexist comments made his supporters more willing to tolerate and repeat these views.
 
The point of Grossman’s article seems to be that political parties are divided and that they continue to move away from one another, with voters increasingly following the views of their candidates  to more extreme positions. 
 
The article comes to this conclusion:
 
The Trump administration, liberals’ resistance to it, and the 2018 campaign cycle give us no reason to believe that the divisions in our society will narrow anytime soon.
 
It’s a conclusion I’ve seen often.  There’s a huge divide in politics. It’s getting worse and people are becoming extremists.  That’s where we leave it.
 
But this conclusion doesn’t really get to the “why” of the matter.  Why did people change their views to match those of their candidates? Why did democrats show more inclination to change with their candidates? Is it possible that watching the racist treatment of Barack Obama over the years allowed the people who voted for him, and even some of those who didn’t, understand that racism was alive and well? Is it possible that watching Donald Trump treat Hillary with such contempt actually proved her point? 
 
Is it possible that as the candidates talked about the stories of police brutality that spurred the Black Lives Matter movement that people who were listening reacted with empathy and changed their views accordingly?  Honestly?  Not as a matter of partisan extremism? 
 
I’m not criticizing Grossman here.  The point of his article was to discuss the “what” of partisanship and how it happened.  But as someone who voted moderate and largely republican before the Obama years, I know that stories can change the way you feel about almost everything.  Listening to other people tell their stories, trying to empathize with their humanity, can be a life and values changing event.  And refusing to listen to the stories people are trying to tell and listening instead to the stories of people who are othering them has the opposite effect.
 
In this era of social media and smart phones, we have the opportunity to really listen to other people, to really see the world from their point of view.  This will change us if we let it.  And that’s a good thing.  Stories lived in real time are compelling to people who can listen with empathy and frightening to people who cannot.
 
These stories lived in real time are compelling to people who can view the stories of others with empathy.   
 
https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/people-are-changing-their-views-on-race-and-gender-issues-to-match-their-party/

. 
 


Picture

Bio:
Julie Carpenter is the creator of the Sacred Chickens website.  She is dedicated to telling stories and making sure that indie writers and publishers have a way to be heard.  She uses narrative, her own and others’, to help interpret the world. She has a Master of Professional Writing from the University of Memphis, with an emphasis in Composition Theory. She wants to bend reality one story at a time.  Julie’s work has appeared in Fiction on the Web and will be included The New Guard. She is currently working on a novel.

0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Picture

    ​BUY NOW!

    Click Photo above to buy ebook or paperback from Amazon.

    ​Here's the link to
    Barnes and Noble

    Or order through your favorite independent bookstore!​
    email Julie

    Categories

    All
    Author Spotlight
    Blog Post
    Digging In
    Essay
    Film/Tv Review
    Gardening
    Music Review
    Original Poem
    Original Story
    Poetry
    Politics
    Random Thoughts
    Recommendations
    Review
    Uncle Morty
    Uncle Morty On Writing
    Weekend Reading
    Writing Contest

    Archives

    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    March 2024
    January 2024
    October 2023
    June 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013

    RSS Feed